vovuh's blog

By vovuh, history, 4 years ago, In English

1426A - Floor Number

Idea: fcspartakm

Tutorial
Solution

1426B - Symmetric Matrix

Idea: BledDest

Tutorial
Solution

1426C - Increase and Copy

Idea: vovuh

Tutorial
Solution
Solution 2

1426D - Non-zero Segments

Idea: BledDest

Tutorial
Solution

1426E - Rock, Paper, Scissors

Idea: fcspartakm

Tutorial
Solution

1426F - Number of Subsequences

Idea: fcspartakm

Tutorial
Solution
  • Vote: I like it
  • +102
  • Vote: I do not like it

| Write comment?
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

Wow that was faster than flash!!

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +79 Vote: I do not like it

I SUCCESSFULLY GAVE MY FIRST CONTEST. I WAS ABLE TO SOLVE ONE QUESTION.THANK YOU FOR THE EDITORIAL AND I HOPE TO PARTICIPATE IN MORE CONTESTS LIKE THIS AND LEARN NEW THINGS .

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +38 Vote: I do not like it

I wonder how many people did prove the correctness of their solution to problem E.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +41 Vote: I do not like it

    Max flow :)

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      nishant403, please explain how problem E is related to max flows. I tried a lot to think in this direction but could not figure it out.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

        consider rock paper scissor as 3 nodes.

        player1's three nodes : a1,a2,a3

        player2's three nodes : b1,b2,b3

        we link a1 with b1,b2, link a2 with b2,b3, link a3 with b3,b1 (for example a1 is rock,b1 is rock ,b2 is paper ,a1->b1 draw,a1->b2 lose)

        root is the source with infinite flow,the you should maximize b1+b2+b3

        the n — b1 — b2 — b3 is minimum win. so maxflow can tell your the answer(make b1 + b2 + b3 flow as much as possible from a1,a2,a3)

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Thanks for the insight :)

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

          Is maxflow minflow some algo?? Related to graph??

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            4 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            yes

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              4 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              What are the prerequisite to learn it??

              • »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                4 years ago, # ^ |
                  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

                BFS/DFS is enough imo. Then you can look at Ford Fulkerson algo which computes the max flow and min cut.

                • »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  4 years ago, # ^ |
                    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

                  In which question max flow and min cut are usefull??

                • »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  4 years ago, # ^ |
                    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

                  Such as bipartite graph matching,which can be solved with the time complexity of $$$O(\sqrt n m)$$$.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +18 Vote: I do not like it

    Some guys from the testers (and authors) who do not bother about proofs just wrote mincost maxflow solutions :D

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Could you please explain the logic behind E? As in, how do we prove that the optimization problem has that solution?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +64 Vote: I do not like it

    Proof by AC

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +7 Vote: I do not like it

      What a nice proof! I think max flows should be in the tutorial.XD

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    See my proof for E E simple proof

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    Can you provide some resource to understand how maxflow works in such problems or at least topic names?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I wrote the following during the contest, and it got accepted. I see a lot of confusion in the comments about the problem. Can you please check and tell me if this is a correct approach? I am doubtful (after reading so many comments about 'flow') if I got lucky that it passed all test cases.

    #include <bits/stdc++.h>
    using namespace std;
    
    int main() {
        int n;
        cin >> n;
        int a[3];
        int b[3];
        for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) cin >> a[i];
        for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) cin >> b[i];
        int ans1 = max(a[0] - (b[2] + b[0]), 0) + max(a[1] - (b[1] + b[0]), 0) + max(a[2] - (b[2] + b[1]), 0);
        int ans2 = min(a[0], b[1]) + min(a[1], b[2]) + min(a[2], b[0]);
        cout << ans1 << " " << ans2;
    }
    
    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      This is correct. We can prove it by greedy. The structure of answer at the end must be one of the $$$( a_1, b_2)$$$, $$$(a_2, b_3)$$$, $$$(a_3, b_1)$$$ after deleting the other elements optimaly. Suppose $$$a_1$$$ has the biggest remaining value after deletion. (The other situations are similar), then $$$a_1$$$ is the hardest to delete. We should delete $$$a_1$$$ with all $$$b_1$$$ and $$$b_3$$$. If we waste $$$b_1,b_3$$$ in deleting $$$a_2,a_3$$$,the answer will be even worse. If $$$a_1 < 0$$$ then the answer is $$$0$$$ (we can even save elements from the hardest case, therefore $$$a_2,a_3$$$ can also be deleted to $$$0$$$), otherwise the answer should be $$$a_1 - b_1 - b_3$$$.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

i wonder if those russian high school students are also checking out the solutions in coddeforces or not ?

Nice problemset btw .

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +9 Vote: I do not like it

    Nah, the first few stages of this competition are hosted on our local site with some really dumb restrictions I don't want talk about. But, iirc, the third (semifinals) stage is hosted on some local domain of codeforces.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

To all the 'wow that was fast' comments, that's what she said...!!

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

In problem E, for finding the min wins many people have directly used max(0, a1 — b1 — b3) + max(0, a2 — b1 — b2) + max(0, a3 — b2 — b3) . Can someone prove how this is correct ?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    We need to use max(0, a1 — b1 — b3) a1 for b2, It's similar for other two cases. The only problem is that we use some (b1 + b3) for a1 and some (b1 + b2) for a2, will it be enough? We can see that (b1 + b2 + b3) is greater or equal to (a1 + a2), so it's ok.

    I think this greedy solution works correctly. However, I'm sorry that I can't give a formal prove.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Is it actually correct??? maybe just the pretests???

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I did $$$max(0, b1 - a1 - a2, b2 - a2 - a3, b3 - a3 - a1)$$$ and it passed. I have some intuition that it would work but not sure at all. Someone prove this please.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 6   Vote: I like it +11 Vote: I do not like it

      We have a draw if Bob use the same thing as Alice and losing if Bob counters some specific item.

      Wins for Alice are situations where Bob have some extra $$$b'_i$$$, which cannot be matched with $$$a_i$$$ or $$$a_{(i+1)\%{3}}$$$. If there are no such extra $$$b'_i$$$ then Bob can create outplaying strategy.

      So, if we have some $$$b_i$$$, such that

      $$$b_i > a_i + a_{(i+1)\%{3}}$$$

      then

      $$$b'_i = b_i - a_i - a_{(i+1)\%3}$$$

      Our goal is to find all these $$$b'_i$$$.

      We can prove that: there is only one such $$$b_i$$$ , if it exists.

      Proof:

      Let we have 2 of them, $$$i \neq j$$$

      $$$b_i > a_i + a_{(i+1)\%{3}}$$$

      $$$b_j > a_j + a_{(j+1)\%{3}}$$$

      then

      $$$b_i + b_j > a_i + a_j + a_{(i+1)\%{3}} + a_{(j+1)\%{3}}$$$

      For every $$$i, j$$$ the same situation will appear:

      $$$b_i + b_j > a_k + a_m + 2a_{3-k-m}$$$

      $$$(k \neq m)$$$

      Also we have this statement

      $$$b_i + b_j + b_{3-i-j} = a_k + a_m + a_{3-k-m} = n$$$

      And so, next statement is going to be true

      $$$a_{3-k-m} + b_{3-i-j} < 0$$$

      Or simply

      $$$a_p + b_q < 0$$$

      For some $$$p$$$ and $$$q$$$, but every $$$a_p$$$ and $$$b_q$$$ are >= 0, so we have a contradiction.

      So, there is only one group of items with extra items in it or there is no such group. Quantity of these extra items is the answer, otherwise the answer is 0.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        I think instead of a(i+1)%3 and a(j+1)%3 there should be a(i+2)%3 and a(j+2)%3,correct me if I am wrong. Anyway great explanation!

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Obviously, this is a lower bound, but can we reach it? Just to prove it (1) (a1-b1-b3)+(a2-b1-b2)+(a3-b2-b3) = -n (2) B1=a1-b1-b3 >= -n (3) B2=a2-b1-b2 >= -n (4) B3=a3-b2-b3 >= -n If two of them are greater than 0, then the other is less than -n, but this is impossible, all three are either less than or equal to 0, or only one is greater than 0. I.If B1<=0,B2<=0 and B3<=0,this is correct. II.Only one is greater than 0.For example, a1-b1-b3>0, and after removing the game that Alice won, a1=b1+b3, so that b1 and b3 consume a1. At this time, b1=0, b3=0, a1=0, obviously a2 , a3 can't win b2

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Was this tutorial posted even before the contest finish? xD

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

You came early

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Lol I solved E exactly same as written in editorial , I initially thought that it was an overkill but now I realized it was intended.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Could anyone please show me the steps for n = 42?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    For the first 5 steps, add 1 to get [6] as the array

    For the next 6 steps, append 6 in the array to get [6 6 6 6 6 6 6]

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      How the author arives at the part that not more than O(sqrt(n)) is required if anyone can help me proving this.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        You to make the sum at least n. so best way is to go till sqrt(n) and then just append it. Check the sample cases.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +7 Vote: I do not like it

        Assume that we are fixing x as the value taken by all elements of the array, and y as the number of elements. We need to check for all (x, y) such that x * y >= n.

        For a particular x, y can simply be calculated as y = ceil(n / x). Thus, the number of moves required = (x — 1) + (y — 1) = x + y — 2

        If you take x beyond sqrt(n), you start getting same values for y for continuous range of x, which implies unnecessarily wasting moves by increasing the value of our array element to a higher x, and appending it the same number of times, y.

        Consider the case of n = 12

        x = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]

        y = [12, 6, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1]

        As you can see, after x = sqrt(n), y takes the same value for a range of x out of which we only need the distinct one's.

        The distinct values of y (after x = sqrt(n)) are y = [3, 2, 1] and corresponding x = [4, 6, 12] which gives the same (x, y) pairs as traversing x till sqrt(n) did, just the values are swapped!

        P.S. : not a very formal proof, but I hope this helps you understand why checking beyond sqrt(n) is not required.

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          int ans=INT_MAX; for(int i=1;i*i<=n;i++){ int x=ceil((n)/(float)i); ans=min(ans,i-1+x-1); } cout<<ans<<endl;

          Why is this not correct?

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            4 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

            Not sure if float causes an overflow, try changing it to double ?

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

          Thanks a lot for the help. cuber_coder

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          soln Actually, it reduces to this, can you please expain the correctness of the above o(1) solution?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        lets say the number of times we do +1 operation be x,then number of steps will be (x-1)+(n-1)/x,minimimum occurs when x-1=(n-1)/x (using A.M.,G.M. property),hence x=sqrt(n).

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

For C: Answer = sqrt(4*N — 1) — 1

Is this correct ?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 4   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    let the increment be X, then the answer must be Ans= ceil((n-x)/x) + x-1 So using the arithmetic mean concept answer is greatest when both terms are equal, so ceil((n-x)/x) = x-1 or you can say that x must be in between sqrt(n)-10 to sqrt(n)+10

    My submission : 94074745

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Hi ,

      can you please explain , the reasoning behind considering both terms equal .afaik , Ans >= 2 * (ceil(n-x)/x)*(x-1) acc to AM>=GM . what am i missing ?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
        Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

        We know that AM >= GM But we want answer to be minimum possible, That mean AM=GM (least possible) That mean (x+y)/2= sqrt(xy) this is only possible when x=y. => (ceil(n-x)/x) = (x-1) => ((n-x)+(x-1))/x = (x-1) =>. (n-1)/x = x-1 Or we can say that x = sqrt(n) ± 10.. If you are still confused ask me I would be happy to solve them ans pls like this comment :)

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
          Rev. 5   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          I am very new to coding, Can you please explain me in problem C, we were trying to make an array but you are using arithmetic mean and geometric mean. How did you reach to that conclusion? I understood solution1 in editorial but cannot reach to AM and GM.

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            4 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            In these type of Questions first try to find the function of answer which is dependent on x. Then try to figure out how you would maximize it. Solve as many problems as you can.. this will help alot.. :)

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              4 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              Could you please tell me where can I find such problems ?

              I want to practise this types of problems more

              • »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                4 years ago, # ^ |
                  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

                I dont know any specific topic, I would suggest keep reading editorial and comments for such tricks :)

                • »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  »
                  4 years ago, # ^ |
                    Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

                  Finally I understood AM and GM. Thanks for your help

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          3 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          i can understand the AM>=GM concept. so (n-1/x) + (x-1) is to be minimised. from here how do you relate it to AM , GM ?

          Also how did you come to the conclusion that we have to increase till sqrt(n) and then copy

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            3 years ago, # ^ |
            Rev. 4   Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

            We know that for two positive numbers a and b,

                    AM >= GM
            => (a+b)/2 >= sqrt(a*b)
            => (a+b)   >= 2*sqrt(a*b)
            

            and the equality holds only when a=b..

            so, from there we get that (n-1/x) + (x-1) is minimum only when (n-1/x) = (x-1) solving it we'll get x = 0.5 ± sqrt(n - 1.5) so to be on safe side check for all the values of x form [sqrt(n)-10 , sqrt(n)+10].

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              3 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              Thank you for your valuable time. Also answer my second qn , how did you come to the conclusion that we have to increase till sqrt(n) and then copy ie. before coming up with the before (n-1/x) + (x-1) after taking ceil ie (n-x+(x-1))/x + x-1

              • »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                3 years ago, # ^ |
                  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

                we have to increase till sqrt(n) We don't have to go till the sqrt, I'm saying that the answer lies between [sqrt(n)-10 , sqrt(n)+10]

                Also for the ceil part,

                ceil(x/y) = (x+y-1)/y you can check by putting random numbers.. :)

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone please explain the approach in F?

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How is this possible Editorial was out before the contest xD! The questions were easy but conceptual...Thanks vovuh!

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +11 Vote: I do not like it

The editorial came in O(1) time.

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it -6 Vote: I do not like it

I think the problem E should have been B/C question type because, for minimum moves, we had to just generate all permutations in a brute force. Not much logic involved over there!

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    this is actually how i do it XD

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      E is not even a problem to 1800, just dont get why testers put a such easy problem to that position

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

I thought it would be too stupid to generate all combinations on E and I gave up...

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

Problem C can be done without even using a loop, basic math.

long long i = ceil(sqrt(n));
long long ans = i + (n+i-1)/i - 2;
//Print ans
  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    can u explain?

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Try to plot the graph of the formula given in the editorial: x + ceil(x/n) - 2 If you remove the ceiling from the expression, the resulting expression x + x/n - 2 is a lower bound for the initial expression (because always ceil(x) >= x). So, if we find the smallest integer value of that expression for x >= 0, we'll be done. Using some calculus, you can find that this expression is minimized for x = sqrt(n), so ceiling it and plugging it into the original equation will give us the smallest integer value of the expression. (I hope I could explain it correctly...)

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    how can you be sure that i = ceil(sqrt(n)) , UPD : got it

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone explain for problem C, how adding 1 till we reach a number x and then copying it is the most optimal way?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    As suggested in the editorial, we can prove this by swapping the order of the two operations and checking which results in a better solution.

    Let's say you have $$$x$$$ in the beginning, if you do increment and add, you'll have $$$(x+1)+(x+1) = 2x+2$$$. Instead, if you decide to add and then increment, you'll have $$$x + x + 1 = 2x+1$$$.

    Thus we can see that if we ever do increment after adding to set, we'll always be worse off. That is, we should always increment the value first and then add it.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

      I am using ternary search to find the minimum of the function given in the tutorial but I am getting WA on test case 2. Could you tell me what is the problem? Submission: https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/94132053

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
        Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

        The function $$$F(x) = x + n/(x+1)$$$ is ternary on real numbers when $$$x, n >= 0$$$.

        But for integers $$$F(x) = x + ceil(n/(x+1))$$$ doesn't seem to be ternary.

        Both functions seem to have their minimum point pretty close tho (I don't have a proof for this. I hope somebody could provide one or even some insight or intuition).

        You can plug in arbitrary values of n and draw both functions here to visualize it: https://www.desmos.com/calculator.

        You can avoid this problem in this problem by searching using doubles and try the integers around the minimum point (which may or may not be fractional). I did something similar in this submission: https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/94170281

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          What a nice trick!

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            4 years ago, # ^ |
            Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

            Please note that this is not a general trick. It relies on both functions having their minimas pretty close.

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              4 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

              I know, but I guess that the ceil function is what make F(x)=x+ceil(n/(x+1)) not unimodal, so removing the round part give us a better candidate function for ternary search...

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              4 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

              Thanks for the clarification btw

              • »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                4 years ago, # ^ |
                  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

                You're welcome. Thanks for the insights.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone help me figure out why didn't my solution to C work even though it iterates from 1 to 2*sqrt(n) ? Here's my submission and thank you :)

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Simple Solution for F using combinatorics. 94117068

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Kindly explain your solution.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Fix the $$$b$$$ in a position and count the number of possible $$$a$$$ in the prefix and possible $$$c$$$ in the suffix.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Problem A: Can someone explain how did the formula floor(n-3 / x ) + 2 come from? Thanks in advance

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

    We have, $$$2 + x + x + x + ... + x \geq N \Rightarrow 2 + (Step-1) \times x \geq N$$$

    This results in $$$Step \geq \frac{N-2}{x} + 1 \Rightarrow Step = \lceil\frac{N+x-2}{x}\rceil$$$

    Now, either you can just use this in your program, or else there is a neat way to do this and that is $$$\lceil\frac{a}{b}\rceil = \lfloor\frac{a+b-1}{b}\rfloor$$$. If you use this result, then the above expression converts to $$$Step = \lfloor\frac{N+2x-3}{x}\rfloor = \lfloor\frac{N-3}{x}\rfloor + 2$$$.

    You can try to verify that the ceil to floor conversion works for yourself.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      I understand the ceil to floor conversion, but would you please elaborate the inequality to equality conversion of Step ≥ N−2x+1 ⇒ Step=⌈ (N+x−2)/ x⌉ ?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Basically, we want the smallest integer which is either equal to or greater than this fraction, which is the definition of the ceiling function.

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Oh, I understood you just transformed the 1 into x / x so you can use the ceiling to flooring conversion. Thank you

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            4 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            Actually, you don't even need to do that, you can leave the 1 as is an only change the fraction. It'll come out to be the same.

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              4 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              what is step-1

              • »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                4 years ago, # ^ |
                  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

                Step is the level you are at. So $$$2$$$ for the first level and for the remaining $$$Step-1$$$ levels you have $$$x$$$ rooms, which gives you, $$$2 + (Step-1)\times x$$$ total rooms.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      can you tell me the corresponding mathematical topic of this approach.like how to find the formula

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        I am not sure how to answer this. I'm tempted to say this comes under linear equations!? After getting the equation, I don't think you need to get the exact formula as stated in the editorial, just solve it as you would on paper.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

Another solution for finding minimum wins for ALICE in E . a1 b1 c1 ---> set with alice

a2 b2 c2 ---> set with bob.

to minimize wins a1 must be played against a2 and c2 thus a1 depends on a2 , c2 b1 depends on b2 a2 c1 depends on c2 b2.

also I claim that a2 handles a1 and b1 . b2 handles b1 , c1 , c2 handles c1 and a1 that is cyclic order. lets supppose any one of the following situation is true.

a2>=(a1+b1) --->(1)

b2>=(b1+c1) ---->(2)

c2>=(c1+a1) ---->(3)

in any of this case we can make 2 values of a1,b1,c1=0; example in case of situation 1 a1 b1 can become 0. c1 can be minimised by remaining b2 c2. by subtracting minimum accordingly. thus remaining value of c1 is answer. similarly we can check for other cases.

In case any of these situation is not true

then simply the minimum value is 0. proved below

Proof.

Since a2<(a1+b1); b2<(c1+b1)==>(4); c2<(c1+a1) -->(5) since every 3 inequality holds so at first we can reduce any one of a1 and b1 by amount a2 and make a2 completely 0. then from inequality 4 we can make b1 0 and b2 0 or still if we have b2 left we can reduce c1 . now reduces some a1+c1==c2 as we reduced a1 +b1+c1 by amount a2+b2 and since a1+b1+c1==n thus reduced value is n-(a2+b2)==c1. thus remaining sum from first set equals last remaining value. Hence we can make alice lose every match in this scenario.

Submission!

94112692

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    Small correction brother, thus reduced value is n-(a2+b2)==c2 not c1

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone explain a solution using flows in problem E? I know only the basics on this topic and I'm really curious how it can be applied in this problem.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

    You can link the source to Alice's options (1-rock, 2-scissors, 3-paper) with their respectives capacities (a1, a2, a3) and the sink to Bob's ones (4-rock, 5-scissors, 6-paper) with capacities (b1, b2, b3). Then link the options that make Alice not win (draw or lose) mentioned in the editorial with infinite capacity and just calculate the max flow in that network. The edges will be:

    (source, 1)
    (source, 2)
    (source, 3)
    (1, 4)
    (1, 6)
    (2, 4)
    (2, 5)
    (3, 5)
    (3, 6)
    (4, sink)
    (5, sink)
    (6, sink)
    

    Note that (4, 5, 6) are Bob's options (rock, scissors, paper) but with other numbers to not repeat nodes. So the minimun number of rounds Alice can win will be (n — max flow) Code: link

    • »
      »
      »
      3 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      "Then link the options that make Alice not win (draw or lose) mentioned in the editorial with infinite capacity and just calculate the max flow in that network"

      Can you please give some intuition behind the infinite capacity part. ( I got how the edges will be connected but why the capacity will be infinite ?)

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        3 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

        Sure, here we are maximizing the amount of times that Alice can draw or lose (minimizing the times that win) and the flow algorithm just add the Edge with the minimal capacity in the augmenting path. We don't want to consider the capacity of these intermediate edges, so assign infinite to them ensure that :)

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can we do the third problem using DP?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    no because of time limits. otherwise we can make a recursive solution easily.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      How? can you tell the recurrence?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
        Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        ok so we have to make n from least steps. and our recurrence depends on two things. first -> value we want , second- > max value we have. n = value we want, maxi = max value we have. solve(n, maxi) = 1 + min((solve(n-1, maxi+ 1), solve(n-maxi, maxi)); here base case is if n <= then return 0;

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          great!! I couldn't come up with it but got the thought process.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/94126035

Can anyone tell me the error in this sol for D?

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Please look at these two submissions to problem C.

Sub1 : https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/94126382

Sub2 : https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/94126537

Sub1 uses ceil function and Sub2 uses the technique in author's solution 1.

Sub2 is accepted while Sub2 gaves TLE. Can you please explain why ceil function lead to TLE? ;_;

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Maybe some problem with double or something. People usually avoid using ceil for these reasons.

    P.S. I don't know if you know this or not, but C++ has a build-in swap function.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

      Done!! I would never use ceil again ;_;.

      Oh ok, I didn't know about swap.

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Its just me or someone also felt that nowadays problem A,B,C in codeforces Div-2 and Div-3 rounds are of almost same levels?

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +44 Vote: I do not like it

another nice solution for F with math.

we can make substring abc by taking a charecter b and one a in left(left of b) and one c in right side(right of b)

hence for a string s (which doesn't contain '?') we can calculate the number of abc subsequence as the following method :

$$$a_i = $$$number of a before the positon i

$$$c_i = $$$number of c after the positon i

$$$ans = \sum_{\text{s[i]=='b'}}{a_i\times c_i}$$$

If we allow '?' in our string then what will happen? :

$$$p_i = $$$number of ? before the positon i

$$$q_i = $$$number of ? after the positon i

Then for $$$i^{th}$$$ position if it is 'b' then in left there might be $$$a_i + k$$$ numbers of a , where $$$0\le k \le p_i$$$

how many string are there that have exactly $$$a_i + k$$$ numbers of a before the $$$i^{th}$$$ position ?

the answer is $$$\binom{p_i}{k}\times 2^{p_i-k}$$$

(we can do , pretty much the same things for right side)

summing up the idea we got our total answer:

$$$\text{answer = }\sum_{\text{s[i]=='b' or s[i]=='?'}}{(\sum_{k=0}^{p_i}{(a_i+k)\times\binom{p_i}{k}\times 2^{p_i-k}}) \times (\sum_{k=0}^{q_i}{(c_i+k)\times\binom{q_i}{k}\times 2^{q_i-k}})}$$$

we can write $$$(\sum_{k=0}^{p_i}{(a_i+k)\times\binom{p_i}{k}\times 2^{p_i-k}})$$$ this part as this $$$(3^{p_i-1}(3a_i+p_i))$$$

this things reduce our solution in :

$$$\text{answer = }\sum_{\text{s[i]=='b' or s[i]=='?'}}{(3^{p_i-1}(3a_i+p_i)) \times (3^{q_i-1}(3c_i+q_i))}$$$

we can easily calculate this in O(n)

you can see my solution here

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    steinum we can write (∑pik=0(ai+k)×(pik)×2pi−k) this part as this (3pi−1(3ai+1)). Is there any formula for this line you wrote??

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +12 Vote: I do not like it

      well , I dont know if there is any well known formula for it or not.

      $$$\sum{(a_i+k)\times \binom{p_i}{k} \times 2^{p_i-k}}$$$

      $$$\Longrightarrow a \sum{\binom{p_i}{k} \times 2^{p_i-k}} + \sum{k \times \binom{p_i}{k} \times 2^{p_i-k}}$$$

      $$$\Longrightarrow 3^{p_i}a+3^{p_i-1}p_i$$$

      for the first part we can define a problem : you have to choose 'k' ball from p ball and color them white, for the rest of the ball you can color them with eigther black or blue

      this problem can relate $$$\sum{\binom{p_i}{k} \times 2^{p_i-k}}=3^{p_i}$$$

      and, for the second part we can define another problem : you have to choose 'k' ball from p ball and color them white, for the rest of the ball you can color them with eigther black or blue. And from the white balls you can pick one ball

      this problem can relate $$$\sum{k \times \binom{p_i}{k} \times 2^{p_i-k}}=3^{p_i-1}p_i$$$

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can C be solved using Binary search ? it worked on sample test cases but i guess i was not able to converge the search space?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    You can solve it using the ternary search. The answer will first decrease and then increase. But if you have the intuition that the answer won't be too big, you can just iterate until your new answer is better than the previous one.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/94078419 Can't it be done only using binary search?

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Ternary search may not work. The answer is not strictly increasing or decreasing.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Yes, you're right, Thanks!

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
          Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          I have done it using ternary search. The only thing you need to take care is that when the (value at mid) == (value at (mid + 1)) then recursively search for the best answer in both (low, mid -1) and (mid + 1, high) ranges.

          My submission : 94125048

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Actually ternary search can work here..you can have a look at the graph :

        Screenshot-49

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Screenshot-from-2020-09-29-11-57-00

          Note x can only take integer values.

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            4 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            Oh yes I missed putting floor...but still the graph does decrease then increase/

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              4 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              But not "strictly", for ternary search the graph must be strictly decreasing then strictly increasing.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In D, Why do we need to clear the set? Can't we keep the prefixes from the left side and move on?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

    Then you will count extra. Ex- 1 -2 1 -2 3. In this case you will add a positive no in bw -2 and 1. but you will add extra since you will consider tha array -2 1 -2 3 also as sum=0.. But we have already inserted a no so sum is not 0. Hence we don't want to save arr[0] and arr[1] contribution in set.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    No, because the prefixes "restart" after you insert a big number.

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Please explain what this line means in E :

"It can be shown that if we started using some combination we are better to end it before using the other one. " .

Does it means that we need to minimise both of them by minimum of them ?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    It means suppose we are currently Choosing paper for Alice and Scissor for Bob , then we must continue until its not possible to use this combination (because either paper finished or scissor finished or both).

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Fine. But then editorial also says that order of these steps does not matter.

      So i perform for first test case as follows:

      Take a1 and b1. Nothing changes.

      Take a2 and b2. Both reduces to 0.

      Take a3 and b3. Nothing changes.

      Only value remains are b1 and a3.

      So minimum value should be 1 using these steps . Where i went wrong ?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    So these are the 6 types of combinations in which Alice loses. So it can be shown that if you are going to use some combination more then once, for example — a2 and b1, it is never efficient to use a2 — b1, then use another combination and again a2 — b1. So now you have six different segments of combinations which you got to reorder in the best way. You try all 6! variations and choose the best one.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      I get it that we can try all orders of combinations.

      But why editorial says "It is also possible that the order of these combinations does not matter, but we didn't prove that fact " ?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Aah, it means that there might be a constant solution where you don't have to try all variations but they haven't proved it.

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

For problem E how we will get minimum win as 119 for following example?

319
10 53 256
182 103 34

129 is lowest I can think of.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    First use all your Papers against their Paper and Scissors. In this way, you'll have 119 Papers remaining.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Got it. Thank you!

      I want to know how this max flow works in such problems. I think 94072786 uses max flow.

      If you can provide me with some resource that would be great. Thank you again.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -6 Vote: I do not like it

This contest was one of the greatest programming contest..I have ever seen in my life..(problem statements pleased me!)

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    yeah..that was super..the problem statements are so cool..and I like easy small codes..and wanted more contests from..BledDest,fcspartakm and vovuh..thank you guys for this contest..

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I think max flow is easier than other approaches for E xD. Maybe it should be written in the tutorial, at least it's interesting.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Problem F is a thing of beauty.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it
So,I think I have a more clear solution for D.For every [l,r] which is 0 ,we want to insert as few as possible numbers to break them,we have an idea that find all the [l,r] which equals 0 and select as few as possible points to "touch" all the intervals(which I means that makes every interval has at least one point) and we find it is O(n^2) but the greedy model is classical,we sort the intervals and select as right  point as possible and we find that for [l1,r] [l2,r](l2>l1) if we can touch [l2,r] we can touch [l1,r] so,we just store the [l2,r]=0 which the l2 is the biggest.

Sorry for my poor English,and it may sound silly...But I hope it will be helpful for you bros

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anybody tell why the best solution will be near sqrt(n) in Problem C

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    We should get n (or nearest) by multiplying two numbers and the sum of two numbers should be minimum (greedy) hence, the rule!

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Which numbers do we multiply? We can only do +1 or copy (sum). Where is the multiplication?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        You increment some times ok, this takes you to $$$X$$$. This will take approx $$$X$$$ steps. Now you'll add it $$$Y$$$ times to make the sum $$$N$$$. This will take $$$Y$$$ steps. You want $$$X+Y$$$ to be minimum, given $$$XY=N$$$. Which gives you the desired condition of approx $$$\sqrt{N}$$$

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

For C, How did you come up with the intuition that we only need to go till sqrt(n) instead of n/2?

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone tell me on what test case my solution for B fails? It is hacked. Here is my submission.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I misunderstood problem C and wrote a completely different solution but it still seems to pass the tests. Can someone hack my solution or tell me why it is correct. This 94146956 is my submission. Also I wonder if anyone else wrote a similar solution?

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

i think proplem E must D and D must be E any one see that E is so easy

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

for Problem C why the array could not consists of copies of different numbers?

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

for problem 1 instead of the formula mentioned above i used (ceil((n-2)/x)+1), this too passed all the test cases, could someone explain me whether this is equal to the formula mentioned above or is there any test case where this fails

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    It's same, you can use $$$\lceil \frac{a}{b}\rceil = \lfloor\frac{a+b-1}{b}\rfloor$$$

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Why is p(r) and p(l-1) has to be same in problem D??? Can someone please explain it to me

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    If p(r) = p(l-1) we can say there ia no change is prefix sum or sum of the interval (l,r) is 0.

    Arr[l] + arr[l+1]....arr[r] = 0

    P(r) — p(l-1) = 0

    So, P(r) = p(l-1)

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

It is also possible that the order of these combinations does not matter, but we didn't prove that fact.

What does this statement mean? I tried running the brute against this:

47

14 21 12

30 9 8

But for more than 500 different orders the minimum calculated was different from the actual one.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

    He might be taking of some special cases

    Like, a= {3,3,3} and b= {5,5,5}

    Here the order of permutation doesn't really matter.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

      Okay, I thought that the order doesn't matter in general because mentioning that it won't matter for some special cases is unnecessary.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone explain me 1426D — Non-zero Segments problem's logic please. I am not able to understand the provided solution.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

    Let us define $$$presum_{k}$$$ as the prefix sum, $$$a_k$$$ as the array.

    $$$ presum_{k} = \sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i $$$

    Let's define $$$i,j$$$ as indexs($$$i < j$$$):

    • if $$$presum_{i} == presum_{j}$$$, we can know that
    $$$ presum_{j} - presum_{i} == 0 \rightarrow sum\{a_{i+1}, \cdots, a_{j}\} == 0 $$$

    In order to avoid this situation, we insert a $$$+\infty$$$ behind the $$$a_j$$$. Like this: $$$a_{i+1}, \cdots, a_{j-1}, \stackrel{\infty}{\downarrow},a_{j}$$$.Then reconsider from $$$a_j$$$

    Part of the core code:

    void solve(){
        int n = read();
        unordered_map<LL, int> mp; // 0 --> not in, 1 --> in
        mp.clear();
        LL sum(0), ans(0);
        for (int i = 0; i < n; ++ i){
            int f = read();
            sum += f;
            if (sum == 0 || mp.count(sum)) { 
                ++ ans; 
                mp.clear();  // Simulate inserting an infinite number
                sum = f; 
                mp[sum] = 1;
            }
            else mp[sum] = 1;
        }
        cout << ans << '\n';
    }
    
    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      hi first of all nice explanation thank you for that.

      but i have certain doubts

      why we have clear the prefix sum left of the new element added, why we dont consider it anymore and can you tell how the complexity of the program in the editorial is nlogn?

      thanks

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        hi, — Under normal circumstances, we need to add an infinite number to the prefix sum before the insertion position

        Obviously, after inserting an infinite number, we can guarantee that this situation does not exist:

        $$$ presum_i == presum_j $$$

        So we don’t need to consider the prefix sum before the insertion position.If we do not clear it, it will affect subsequent operations.Like this:

        $$$ \overset{+\infty}{\overbrace{1}}, \overset{+\infty}{\overbrace{5}}, insert, 1, 5 $$$

        If you do not clean up, it will appear $$$mp.count(5)$$$. Actually that is $$$5 + \infty$$$. So cleaning is to simulate the process of adding infinity.

        i do not konw the extacly complexity of the program in the editorial, because i konw little about py, if the operation in and add are $$$\mathcal{O}(1)$$$, the algorithm is $$$\mathcal{O}(n)$$$, if the operations are $$$\mathcal{O}(\log n)$$$, the algorithm is $$$\mathcal{O}(n \log n)$$$

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      I have a little bit confusion about test case 3 (-1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 -1 -1) .

      Here prefix sum is-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 1 0 -1 . I have to insert a number before every 0 according to describe above. Then there is only 4 options. So ,How the result is 6?. Please clarify my fault.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        OK, I have also had this problem, which is also the key to solving this problem. You insert a number before the first 0 like this

        $$$ -1, \stackrel{\infty}{\downarrow}, 1, -1, \cdots $$$

        then, the prefix sum will be [Reconsider the next element from infinity]:

        $$$ 1, 0, 1, \cdots $$$

        To make it clearer:

        $$$ \begin{array}{ccccccc} &befor\; insert& -1& 0& -1& 0& \cdots \\ &after\; insert& NULL& \underset{new\,\,start}{\underbrace{1}}& 0& 1& \cdots \\ \end{array} $$$

        You can find that after inserting a number, a new 0 may be generated while eliminating a 0.

        Your idea is offline, but this is actually an online problem. Need dynamic processing. in my opinion

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

My solution to F, it maintain 6 cnt for a, ?, ab, a?, ?b, ?? and get the result.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Hi guys, In problem C: why do we need to add the bolded term? ans = min(ans, x — 1 + ((n — x) + x — 1) / x); and in the tutorial he didn't mentioned this term thanks.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    It's actually a trick for ceiling
    Instead of doing ceil(a / b) you just do (a + b — 1) / b

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

How to solve C if instead of having sum greater than or equal to n it were to be exactly equal to n?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 7   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    The cost for reaching sum exactly n, and for reaching sum at least n is the same. Suppose you are duplicating number i. If n % i = 0 then you reach sum exactly n. Otherwise, while increasing 1 to i with operation one, when you reach n % i duplicate it, this way you save the need to duplicate i one more time, because the n % i will reach the sum to n. As you can see, the cost is the same. Funny thing, same code gets AC in both problems.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

in c why the solution doesnt go beyon root n?

thanks

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    If you increment your number to $$$sqrt(n)$$$, you won't need more than $$$sqrt(n)$$$ copies of it since $$$sqrt(n) * sqrt(n) == n$$$

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 5   Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

As noted, Problem F can have different solutions with varying implementation complexity. Here is a simpler one, imo.

At each index, find count of subsequences 'a', 'ab' and 'abc' ( conveniently named as such in the code below ) appearing in all combinations so far. One thing to note is, when appending 'a', the new 'a' appears in how many? count of number of strings so far (call it 'm' below). Leaving out mods in the (pseudo) code for easier reading.

a = 0, ab = 0, abc = 0, m = 1;
for (char c : s) 
  if (c == 'a') 
     a = a + m;
  else if (c == 'b') 
     ab = ab + a;
  else if (c == 'c')
     abc = abc + ab;
  else { // '?'
     abc = 3 * abc + ab;
     ab = 3 * ab + a;
     a = 3 * a + m;
     m = 3 * m
  }
return abc;

My submission: 94171796

ps: I see this is very similar to DP, except no explicit dp table. It's similar to how you can calculate fibonacci(n) using a=0, b=1, c=1; for(3..n) b = c = a + (a = b); print c; Bad idea to do it in one statement, but meh! you get the idea :)

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    i also thought about same solution. but i couldn't think about m. why m= m*3 and a += 2*a + m what i was doing was a = 3*a + 1. can you explain why you used m and how it work a little more.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it
      • m is total number of different strings so far. For each '?' we have 3 choices ( a, b, c ) so x 3 for each '?'.
      • I updated code to a = 3 * a + m; which is the same. When you see '?', you replace it with one of 'a' or 'b' or 'c'. In each of these cases, you carry over previous counts of a, ab, abc (those not including this index). Additionally, if you include this index, each of them increase by the same factor as in their corresponding cases above.
      • I would suggest you to work out a small case on paper. Some times trying out a case gives you ideas. Eg: Try this "a??b?", Result should be 25.
  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    Amazing solution

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Have a look at my code (accepted) for 1426C - Increase and Copy

int n ;
cin >> n ;

int a = sqrt(n);
int b = n / a ;
if(n % a) b++;

cout << a + b — 2 << endl ;

I hope , you will find it more easy (no loops or iterations) than many other approaches :)

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Please explain your logic !

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      You have to find two integers a and b such that a*b >= n and a+b is minimum possible.
      These values will be sqrt(n) and ceil(n / sqrt(n)).

      Approach :
      You have to increment the 1 (present in array) to a . This will take (a-1) moves.
      Then append this number a to the array (b-1) times.
      Ultimately, element a is present b times in array which gives a*b >= n

      Total moves will be : (a-1) increments + (b-1) appends
      So answer will be (a + b — 2).

      Hope it helps :)

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

The ratings are not updated yet. Is there any problem with the contest or something else? When can we expect rating change? UPD: the ratings are changed now.

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

For problem E, the answer for the minimum can directly be given as $$$max({0, b_1 - a_2 - a_3, b_2 - a_3 - a_1, b_3 - a_1 - a_2})$$$.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I understand that number of moves will be x-1+((n-x)/x) but why ((n-x)+x-1)/x ?? I cant understand the "X-1" at the second part

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    say you wish to get the sum 9 using 4s. you have to use 3 4s (4+4+4=12) but a simple n/x gives answer 2 in this case. suppose there is a case where we need to get sum 9*k using k's. you need 9 k's. for all n where 9*k < n <= 10*k, the answer has to be 10. (n+k-1)/k ensures this.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      I didn't get it. sorry

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, # ^ |
        Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        take x=4. now, - n/x=0 for n=0,1,2,3. - n/x=1 for n=4,5,6,7. and so on. But we need this: - f(n)=0 for n=0. - f(n)=1 for n=1,2,3,4. - f(n)=2 for n=5,6,7,8. we can get this if f(n)=(n+x-1)/x. (we are shifting those x-1 numbers into the next group by adding x-1 to n.)

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    To avoid floating point operations we write it as Ceil(A/B) = Floor(A + B - 1 / B); For example Ceil(7/3) = Floor(7 + 2 / 3) = 3 Or Ceil(7/2) = Floor(7 + 1/ 2) = 4 We convert Ceil to floor because in most programming languages floor(A / B) = A / B. Note : This only works for positive values. For negative values we have to make some changes.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In E, how to proof the maximum number? The editorial doesn't have an detail.
Example:
22
5 8 9
11 7 4
The maximum number is min(5,7) + min(8,4) + min(9,11) = 18
And the thing left is
0 4 0
2 2 0
So The answer is 18-2 = 16 ?
Alice has 4 scissors and Bob has 2 scissors and 2 rocks, so Alice has to lose 2 more rounds?
But the correct answer is 18, so I'm confused. Can anyone explain please ?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Alice won 18 rounds and lost 2 rounds , there is no points thing here so doing 18-2 is not needed. the maximum number of wins will just be 18

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

F is a nice problem

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

soln can someone tell why this solution works for problem c?

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

easy solution for C

formula

is the answer https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/94245532

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it
int main() {
	int o=1,a=0,ab=0,abc=0,n;
	scanf("%d",&n);
	scanf("%s",s+1);
	for(int i=1;i<=n;i++) {
		if(s[i]=='a')a=(a+o)%mod;
		if(s[i]=='b')ab=(ab+a)%mod;
		if(s[i]=='c')abc=(abc+ab)%mod;
		if(s[i]=='?') {
			abc=(3ll*abc+ab)%mod;
			ab=(3ll*ab+a)%mod;
			a=(3ll*a+o)%mod;
			o=o*3ll%mod;
		}
	}
	printf("%d\n",abc);
	return 0;
}

Can anyone tell why we are changing abc,ab,a,and o values in reverse order in s[i] = '?' section and what is the significance of using variable 'o' here

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    "o" is the total number of possible strings so far (it's equal to 3^(number of ?s))

    The assignments are done "backwards" because to calculate abc you need the original ab, not the updated one (same for ab and a, and a and o).

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      "o" is the total number of possible strings so far. ok but why do we need this. when we find "b", we increase count of "ab" by count of "a" so far. because all previous "a" can pair up with this "b" giving us "ab".... and same with "c", when we find "c" , we increase count of "abc" by count of "ab" so far. because all previous "ab" can pair up with this "c" giving us "abc".

      but when we find "a", why are we not just increasing count of "a" by one? because "a" doesn't need to be paired up with any previous character?

      why are increasing count of "a" by number of string? please help

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I need a little help in Problem E :- I thought of solving it like counting number of subsequence of "abc" the transition is trivial to counting number of sub-sequence . i.e if the current characters match then dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + dp[i-1][j] and when it doesn't match and current is not equal to '?' then dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j]. For the question mark part dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 3*dp[i-1][j] actually out of 3 possible character one of it is going to be equal and rest 2 not so this case is just sum of previous 2 cases.

Everything is fine but for consecutive '?' it is wrong for eg for the last sample test-case it gives 44 instead of 46. Can anyone provide feedback am i missing some case??

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    You are missing one thing. Let's say $$$dp(i,\text{'a'})$$$ is the amount of times $$$\text{'a'}$$$ appears in all sequences on prefix $$$[1\dots i]$$$. Let's also say that $$$k_i$$$ is the amount of question marks on prefix $$$[1\dots i]$$$

    Then,

    $$$dp(i,\text{'a'}) = dp(i-1, \text{'a'}) + [s_i = \text{'a' or } s_i = \text{'?'}] \cdot 3^{k_{i-1}}$$$
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone tell what is wrong in my code please

https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/94357901

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it
#include<iostream>
#include<string>
using namespace std;
int main(){
    long long MOD=1000000007;
    int n;
    cin>>n;
    string s;
    cin>>s;
    long long a=0,b=0,c=0,mul=1;
    for (int i=0;i<s.length();i++){
        if (s[i]=='a'){
            a += mul;
            a %=MOD;
        }
        if (s[i]=='b'){
            b += a;
            b %= MOD;
        }
        if (s[i]=='c'){
            c += b;
            c %= MOD;
        }
        if (s[i]=='?'){
            c = (c*3 + b) % MOD;
            b = (b*3 + a) % MOD;
            a = (a*3 + mul) % MOD;
            mul = (mul * 3) % MOD;
        }
    }
    cout<<c;
    return 0;
}
I have a better solution.
  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Can you explain it?

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Of course. a : the number of substring "a" b : the number of substring "a...b" c : the number of substring "a...b...c" mul: the number of strings recently So u can see that when strings were added - "a": a += mul; - "b": the number of substring "a..b" increases by the number of "a" - "c": the same as b; - "?":this is more interesting. The number of strings, a, b, c multiplies by 3 and then increases by 0, mul, a, b respectively. So the answer is c.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

can anyone explain how he find min numbers of win in E problem I didn't understand what he was telling in tutorial.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    try all the combinations.6C2=720 ways to permute all possible options to find the best way. Use next_permutation from C++ for trying all possible combinations.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In problem E the order matters. Random order will give WA.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone explain me, why in problem c solution, ans = min(ans, x — 1 + ((n — x) + x — 1) / x) is written, and not ans = min(ans, x — 1 + n/x). I mean it will take x-1 increments to make 1 equal to x and then the number of moves to make the sum greater than equal to n will be n/x. Please point out where I'm making mistake.

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 4   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How does sqrt(n) solution pass in problem C? There are 1000 test cases and 1000*sqrt(1e9) = 31622776. isn't 30 million operations too much for one second? I think around 2 million operations are maximum for 1 second. vovuh please let me know. Thanks.

»
4 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

problem C: we should copy the number k the square root of the least perfect square that not less than n then the answer is k — 1 + (n — 1) / k

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I solved E with simple recursion. My submission if anyone interested.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    How do you link your submission like this

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      see the options provided by codeforces while writing comment.

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Problem C: I haven't got this line in the editorial : It is pretty intuitive that we firstly need to do all increments and only then copy numbers (because otherwise we can swap the order of moves and the sum will not decrease). Someone please explain me the reason/logic for this statement. Thanks a lot!

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    If you first copy and then increase something, you get a smaller sum. Try it on any example.

»
3 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Alternative solution for F:

I iterated over positions where the value of the position is 'b'. For each position, I precomputed the number of occurrences of 'a' before, '?' before, 'c' after and '?' after.

Now, calculating the number of substrings where 'abc' is contained, where the 'b' is of the position I'm at, is pretty straightforward. https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1426/submission/101849687

»
3 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I have submitted O(sqrt(n)) solution problem C but I it is giving TLE at test case 4, I am not able to figure out what is the problem with my solution. My friend's solution got accepted with same logic. I' going to share both submission links please anyone look into them and let me know what the problem is.

My submission Link: Here

My Friend's Link : Here

Please help me to find the problem with my code.

»
3 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

Editorial for problem F is made ridiculously hard to understand and implement. That's not the easiest way I can assure.

»
2 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone figure out why this code doesnt work

I have used a simple 2-d DP where upto index i :

  1. DP[i].a = the numer of subsequences 'a'

  2. DP[i].ab = the numer of subsequences 'ab'

  3. DP[i].abc = the numer of subsequences 'abc'

when s[i]= a,b or c update them normally and when s[i]='?' , i consider all 3 cases one by one

Where am I wrong? does anyone solve it using 2-D DP instead of 3-D ? is 3-D even necessary here?

»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

in D problem why the time complexity if nlogn it should be o(N) if we are using unordered set , unordered set can work too right ??