| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
This happened in abc213d.
Diffcheck between the two codes (MLE, AC) shows that they are exactly the same, surprisingly though, the MLE code consumes about 1GB+ memory (and significantly greater time) whereas the AC one only consumes 250MB.
It's been bugging me a lot, why would this happen, can anyone please help?
Thanks in advance.
Auto comment: topic has been updated by warks (previous revision, new revision, compare).
For reference, this blog discussed a similar issue, though a definitive conclusion was not reached.
Seems like Mike resolved it as both the submissions in that blog display an AC verdict now, is this a platform issue? Should I tag Atcoder admins? Since I am unsure whether it is a language issue or a platform one, I would rather not disturb them for this.
Again, any inputs would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.