→ Pay attention
→ Streams
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 164 |
| 2 | adamant | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2026 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: May/15/2026 19:19:55 (g2).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
Its funny you think you would get good at dp by reading
IMO, this meme doesn't make sense.
To me, DP isn't really a technique, an algorithm or a trick. I would rather call it an "idea". Even DP itself has many subcategories, including a lot of techniques and tricks. And since it's an "idea", it's just hard to capture it into a blog. As they have always said: there has never existed any good articles on DP.
it should just be cp-algorithms on the left and geeksforgeeks on the right