Hey, can someone find reason for "runtime error on test 5" for this submission https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/559/submission/139264120 for problem https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/559/problem/C I couldn't find it, please help.
Hey, can someone find reason for "runtime error on test 5" for this submission https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/559/submission/139264120 for problem https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/559/problem/C I couldn't find it, please help.
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
sortbysecviolates rules for comparison functions passable to std::sortsorry bro, but I didn't got you. Can you explain more, or refer to some link where I can study about this rule violation thing.
UPD: thanks, I got rid of at least runtime error.
UPD-2:Finally, got AC. And, thanks a lot bro, you guys are awesome. There was no way I could have figured reason by myself. This community is awesome!
A comparison function should return true if the first argument is less than (i.e. is ordered before) the second in the strict ordering relation, and false otherwise.