| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3361 |
| 10 | XVIII | 3345 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
|
0
In Problem D why the answer is -1 when we have both negative and positive in our array after applying the operation (a[i] = a[i] — k) ? |
|
0
How is the time complexity of problem D is O(nlog(n))? |
|
+1
Mine too |
|
0
Is above piece of code works for both odd and even length palindromes or we have to do something more for even length palindromes ?? |
|
0
In your solution you have considered both index and prevstate as your states so TC will be index*prevstate that is why it is giving tle. |
|
On
setuid0 →
[solved] 1678A: wrong answer 986th numbers differ — expected: '0', found: '-1', 4 years ago
0
check for 1 4 0 0 0 0 |
|
On
setuid0 →
[solved] 1678A: wrong answer 986th numbers differ — expected: '0', found: '-1', 4 years ago
0
Consider a case where all the elements of array are zero. |
|
+2
go for c++ |
| Name |
|---|


