| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
|
+1
True, I got confused with the meaning of sword strikes. |
|
0
For any integer a and b with gcd(a,b)=D, there always exists integers x and y, such that ax + by = D. And here we can use gcd, as D is also bounded by K,in other words (ax + by)mod K = D mod K, so there always exists non-negative x and y. If we take gcd(a1,a2,...,an,K)=S, we will get the smallest last digit(other than 0) which we can be obtained using the denominations ( K is also included in the gcd because we need the last digit which is bounded by K). So multiples of S less than K will be the answer because there are the number of denominations are infinite. |
| Name |
|---|


