| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3361 |
| 10 | XVIII | 3345 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 145 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 135 |
| 7 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 132 |
|
0
I guess that means — no. Fine I'll not do it, you have my word. |
|
-8
With every single Round my rating is descending, how sweet. Is it allowed to ask chatgpt for solution during contest? |
|
0
Cute pfp so I'll take a chance ^^ |
|
0
Unrated? Is it a joke or not? |
|
0
In the time converter problem, latest input data can't be a coincidence. I wish I could know what was the inspiration behind this particular input data. 4 problems solved, but stared late today, I hope for a green field. |
|
+9
Oh my gosh another codeforeces round, It's so exciting, can't wait but honestly when will be round for slower and disabled contestants? (where all the problems are easy and time is not so decisive factor, and you really guys are reading all that math equations so easly?) Anyway good luck guys! |
|
0
That feeling when you really need a new backpack knowing that you have no chance to win... |
|
0
I don't really know, only fast checked, but do you think is it safe in the last iteration? I'm aware s.begin()+i+1 seems to be higher than s.end()? I think it's better iterate to s.size()-1 |
|
0
Nevermind, I managed to repair it thanks to one of solutions, so... -->here It seems that I like to complicate simple things. That things happen when I try to rush too much, and type faster than know solution. |
|
0
Anyone can help me debug it? here I was trying find max and min possible temperature at every next moment when customer appear. |
|
0
I also admire people can solve problems that fast, as for me I need more time even for reading and understanding problems and I need time for brakes. How much? it depends.. I think at least 3times more. How about if the time for solving problems depends on rating... For example round time multipler could be 3600/rating. 6 hours sounds better than 2. |
|
0
Welcome gray fields. Cool there's editorial in Top section. |
|
+4
I feel like I'll solve 1-2 problems again. Well, I don't care, I'm in. |
| Name |
|---|


