| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3773 |
| 3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
| 4 | ecnerwala | 3624 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 5 | Benq | 3620 |
| 7 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
| 8 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 8 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | awoo | 161 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 160 |
| 3 | nor | 157 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 156 |
| 4 | cry | 156 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 155 |
| 7 | maroonrk | 154 |
| 8 | adamant | 153 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 151 |
| 10 | djm03178 | 146 |
Accessing iterator after erasing it from set?
Here are two codes for question- Your text to link here...
code 1-Your text to link here...
code 2-Your text to link here...
In code 1 iterator is erased first and dereferenced after that.(Runtime error at test 39).
In code 2 iterator is dereferenced first and erased from set after that.(Accepted)
If code 1 is wrong practice why it got accepted for 38 test cases?
| Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en1 |
|
Iiinertia_1412 | 2022-10-15 21:40:00 | 597 | Initial revision (published) |
