| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3993 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3743 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | Benq | 3564 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
| 9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 156 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
Accessing iterator after erasing it from set?
Here are two codes for question- Your text to link here...
code 1-Your text to link here...
code 2-Your text to link here...
In code 1 iterator is erased first and dereferenced after that.(Runtime error at test 39).
In code 2 iterator is dereferenced first and erased from set after that.(Accepted)
If code 1 is wrong practice why it got accepted for 38 test cases?
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en1 |
|
Iiinertia_1412 | 2022-10-15 21:40:00 | 597 | Initial revision (published) |
