| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
how to prove that a dp solution state is wrong in general?
I'm stuck in this problem 225C - Barcode
Here is my solution 33821210
I tried to calculate the array dp[current_column][width_of_current_group][hash_or_dot], and after i read the tutorial saying that i should calculate only dp[current_column][hash_or_dot] i didn't figure out why my solution was wrong.
I think they are the same, can't see any difference... can somebody help?
| Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
WinstonWolf | 2017-12-31 02:33:07 | 8 | Tiny change: 'ission:33807563]\n\nI tri' -> 'ission:33821210]\n\nI tri' | |
| en1 |
|
WinstonWolf | 2017-12-31 02:31:45 | 461 | Initial revision (published) |
