I wrote a recursive solution with O(n^3) time complexity imo.
But I am getting TLE Verdict on submission .
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | adamant | 152 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
I wrote a recursive solution with O(n^3) time complexity imo.
But I am getting TLE Verdict on submission .
Samples —
3 1 4 2
4 2 1 3
According to the editorial we are taking pairs of indices which form a valid pair (Qj,Pi). All pairs are = (0,3)(1,0),(1,1)(1,2)(1,3)(2,0)(3,0)(3,1). [zero based indexing] Now we are sorting according to (i,-j).
New order of pairs is = (0,-3)(1,-3),(1,-2)(1,-1)(1,0)(2,0)(3,-1)(3,0). Now taking LIS considering only j's, we have ans as 4 but answer should be 2.
There is no clear explanation in the editorial, no C++ sample solution in the editorial and No english youtube video explaining this approach. I also tried to understand solutions of top rated coders but I think they have used fenwick tree.
Can anyone explain please I am stuck in this question since a day trying to understand this editorial.
Can anyone tell me the dp transitions for this problem ? Even after seeing the editorial I am not able to code.
I am getting runtime error on n=1000, m=1000 test cases. Unable to figure out why.
Sorry for messed up code.
| Name |
|---|


