I did this question by Segment tree but my solution is throwing TLE. I I think the TC is O(n logn) for larger cases. So I think it should work this way but it is failing. Is it not possible to further optimize it doing this way ?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3773 |
3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
4 | ecnerwala | 3624 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
5 | Benq | 3620 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
8 | Geothermal | 3569 |
8 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 161 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | nor | 157 |
4 | atcoder_official | 156 |
4 | cry | 156 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 155 |
7 | maroonrk | 154 |
8 | adamant | 153 |
9 | Um_nik | 151 |
10 | djm03178 | 146 |
I did this question by Segment tree but my solution is throwing TLE. I I think the TC is O(n logn) for larger cases. So I think it should work this way but it is failing. Is it not possible to further optimize it doing this way ?
Name |
---|
well the segment tree is O(nlg)
but in program it takes the high coefficient cause this you got TLE
try to code better and don't get it :)
pragma will help