...
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| Name |
|---|



Let, $$$n$$$ = no of nodes, $$$m$$$ = no of edges Finding all pair shortest path using belmenford takes $$$O(n^2m)$$$ but floyed warshal takes $$$O(n^3)$$$ time. floyed is very easy to write and code is short.
Floyd can be optimized to n^3/32
using bitset?
What do you mean by $$$O(V^3)$$$ is mostly more than $$$O(V^2E)$$$?
What if $$$E\gg V$$$?
Yes that why I said mostly and I think that bellman ford takes o((v-1)*v*e)
So then in these cases where $$$E\gg V$$$, the Floyd-Warshall will be much faster, so that's why it's useful
It's useful when E is much bigger than V