redyellow's blog

Binary search + hashing
By redyellow, 11 years ago, In English

hey can you please list some easy string problems where we have to hash the strings and then use binary search on it. please give links to your solutions also because i am not able to implement it. thanks.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +8
  • Vote: I do not like it

Comments Comments (8)
| Write comment?
»
11 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Here are a few problems on Topcoder that can be solved using binary search http://community.topcoder.com/stat?c=problem_statement&pm=3970&rd=7993 http://community.topcoder.com/stat?c=problem_statement&pm=3561&rd=6519 http://community.topcoder.com/stat?c=problem_statement&pm=4823&rd=8074 http://community.topcoder.com/stat?c=problem_statement&pm=4751&rd=8067

If there any problem in trying to solve it. Just say.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    11 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    thanks for those links but i actually meant problems on strings that involve hashing and then binary search. i have edited my question now. anyways i am solving these problems.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      11 years ago, # ^ |
      ← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Given a string, you need to find a longest palindrome substring. It can be solved in O(N) but try to solve it with hash + binary search in O(NlogN).

      UPD: I've found another problem. Click!

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        11 years ago, # ^ |
        ← Rev. 4   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        the second problem can also be solved in (without binary search or hashing). here is the solution.

        → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        11 years ago, # ^ |
        ← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        can you please check this code http://ideone.com/3tdMOZ for the second problem (codechef one).it uses binary search + hashing but i think its O(N^2*logN)

        EDIT: that code had a few bugs so this is my new code http://ideone.com/NIAIZf its still O(n^2logn)

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          11 years ago, # ^ |
          ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

          Well, the whole idea is right but your check function can be done much quicker -- in O(NlogN) instead of O(N2) and the resulting time will be O(Nlog2N).
          In your comment above you write:
          "for each substring of s2 of some length, we need to check if theres a similar substring in s1"
          I'm quite sure you can do it (maybe with some preprocessing) quicker than in O(N) for substring of s2.

          → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          11 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Your check function works slow. How to check if there is a common substring of s1 and s2 which length is L?

          Let's put all hash-substrings of s1 which length is L into an array. This can be done in O(N). Then, for every hash-substring of s2 which length is L, check if there is a same hash in s1. We can just make a binsearch in our array of hashes. It will be O(NlogN).

          So, check will be in O(NlogN) + length binsearch in O(logN), overall O(Nlog^2N). Accepted :)

          Here is my solution: click. Instead binsearch, i've used unordered_set (IT MAKES PROGRAMM SLOWER), so it's better to write binary search.

          → Reply
»
11 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

http://mirror.codeforces.com/problemset/tags/binary%20search?order=BY_SOLVED_DESC

→ Reply