As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
Название |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
As you can see, the stack limit is always 256 MB. The difference is that the 64-bit compiler obviously consumes more memory (in this case, in the stack). Also, as of now, no compiler is judged under Linux.
Why do you say on Linux/Windows? There's nothing in these submissions indicating it, different compiler versions are unrelated to OS.