Check this out 16507699 . It gets ok on the first 7 tests then CE. This stuff is weird :v :V
Check this out 16507699 . It gets ok on the first 7 tests then CE. This stuff is weird :v :V
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 163 |
| 2 | adamant | 149 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 135 |
| 7 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 132 |
Lol, compilation error on test 23.
illuminati
I think maybe CF run different cases on different machines and different machine has different configuration.
Akylbek_A has a better reasoning than this :p
Did you check what the compiler message was?
Can't compile file:
cc1plus.exe: out of memory allocating 65536 bytes
Yeah, happens with me often! compiler optimizes remember, so unless you need large memory, you don't allocate large memory. So its reasonable why you'll get CE on 8th or 23rd test case
No, it's not reasonable at all. The program either compiles or doesn't regardless of the testcase.
Well, it confuses me too, because compile time error due to something happening at runtime???, but the optimization is nice, so maybe they found a way to do so. Do you know anything about this?
Umm, the link Alex7 gave 16507699 doesn't have CE. Its WA.
It was rejudged, pay attention on the time difference
I once got this verdict. Resubmitted the same code using the same compiler and got AC. I hope that doesn't happen to me inside a contest :/