# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 156 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
Name |
---|
I think u have issues with stack size.
"u have" Is that mean that is my machine problem ? does it work for you ?
Yep, everything works fine on my PC, you should either allocate bigger stack or avoid recursion. (I believe it is not that hard in that task, simply use std::stack or array instead of recursion)
You can also iterate backwards through the dp states before answering. If your dp recurrence goes "forward" ( dp(x) depends on dp values greater than x) fill the values from MAXN to 0. Doing that the program will never reach a recursion depth greater than 1. It is a cheap and fast way to fix this kind of issue.