| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3631 |
| 4 | Kevin114514 | 3574 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 3521 |
| 6 | strapple | 3515 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3461 |
| 8 | tourist | 3428 |
| 9 | turmax | 3378 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 140 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
| Name |
|---|



Can anybody from community can help with me this question ? Its been 7hrs and I dont know why people doesnt respond to question that may look small to you but its like mount Everest for me. :/
dp[c][i] — minimal cost of painting the first i columns in NxM rectangle into a barcode the way its last stripe will be (c == 0 ? black : white).
This line checks if it is optimal to paint last a lines in black.
And this line checks if it is optimal to paint last a lines in white.
Can you please explain how the two recurrence relation is formed ?
Well, let's look on Nxi rectangle formed with the first i columns. What can we say about its last stripe? Either it's black or white and his width is ranged from x to y. Therefore, we handle 2 * (y — x + 1) variants. Let's imagine the last stripe in your subrectangle is white. It means that previous stripe's color has to be the different (black). Then, for each a x <= a <= y check the cost of oainting rectangle Nx(i-a) in stripes so it will end with the black stripe (dp[0][i-a])and add the cost of painting columns from i-a+1 to i in white (sum-of-whites(i-a+1,i)). Then we keep the best outcome.
Same thing with the case, where the last stripe in rectangle Nxi is white, but with reverse colouring.