AtCoder Grand Contest 028 will be held on Saturday (time). The writer is maroonrk. This contest counts for GP30 scores.
Contest duration: 150 minutes
The point values will be announced later.
Let's discuss problems after the contest.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
AtCoder Grand Contest 028 will be held on Saturday (time). The writer is maroonrk. This contest counts for GP30 scores.
Contest duration: 150 minutes
The point values will be announced later.
Let's discuss problems after the contest.
Название |
---|
3min
F is solvable in O(N2logN), so please try it.
My solution is slower than most of the O(N3) solutions:(
my implemention
Is there any way to distinguish them?
I have solved task A and I have read 'editorial', but could anyone explain the solution in his own words?
How to solve task B?
Basic idea is this: fix two specific elements i and j. The cost for removing block j will include the weight of i if and only if j is removed first out of the blocks in the section i through j. If not, i will be disconnected from j (or won't be present at all) by the time j is removed.
The number of permutations in which j is removed first among the blocks in i through j is N! / (j — i + 1). That's because there's N! total permutations, there are j — i + 1 blocks in that section, and by symmetry each of the blocks appears first in the same number of permutations.
By precomputing N! / k we get an O(N2) solution. It can be sped up to O(N); maybe you can see how.
Thank you very much :)
Here, two blocks x and y ( x ≤ y ) are connected when, for all z ( x ≤ z ≤ y ), Block z is still not removed. Does it mean only blocks to the left of y are connected to it ? Can someone explain the connectivity of two blocks? or all blocks which are not removed are connected ?
Connectivity is reflexive. By “x and y are connected” they mean “x and y are both connected to each other.”
Does it imply all blocks which are not removed are connected ?
No, the condition for x, y (x <= y) to be connected is that all blocks z in the interval [x, y] should not have been removed yet. If you have three blocks 1, 2, 3 and 2 is removed, then 1 and 3 are no longer connected.
Got it. Thank you !!
Can someone explain how to solve problem B ? I'm not getting it through editorial.
It seems that F1 is solvable in O(N^4/w) with bitset and some optimizations, for example this submission.
Can someone explain the solution to task B?