| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3361 |
| 10 | XVIII | 3345 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
|
+2
It is easy to avoid being hacked, just make some non-bitwise operation on rng() randomly. Like this: Do not just divide or multiply it by $$$2^k$$$ or it will just degenerate into taking a subset of rng(). (which is still hackable) |
|
0
It seems like that it is not O(nq) but O(n^2q) when the string constructed wisely.(tho I don't know if such a string existed.) |
|
0
revised |
|
0
Maybe you need 3 mod NTT: convolution_mod_1000000007 (Which calculate the ans with three different MOD and merge them with CRT(Chinese Remainder Theory) to get ans in MOD=1e9+7) |
|
0
You should test it with codeforces's "Custom Invocation", which will be more consistent with the actual situation of the online judge. |
|
0
Just try to make $$$x = 21, y = 2^{5 + 1} - 21 = 43$$$ to $$$x = y = 2^k = 32$$$: $$$(x, y) = (21, 43) \longleftarrow^1 (42, 22) \longleftarrow^2(20, 44) \longleftarrow^1 (40, 24)\longleftarrow^2(16, 48)\longleftarrow^1(32, 32)$$$ Then you can get the answer by reverse the sequence "12121" -> "12121" |
|
+9
For D, we can construct the whole operation sequences in $$$\mathcal{O}(n)$$$. Code And implement the checker in $$$\mathcal{O}(n\log^2n)$$$ Part of checker If the problem D is changed to this, how would it be rated in the cf rating? |
|
+10
As a tester, the problemset is one of my most favourite one. Good luck, hope you would enjoy it. |
|
+1
just weak system testing |
|
0
As a tester, hope all the participants can change the color of handle to the next rating level |
|
0
Why hasn't the implementation code uploaded yet? |
|
On
atcoder_official →
UNIQUE VISION Programming Contest 2025 Spring (AtCoder Beginner Contest 398) Announcement, 14 months ago
0
E is disturbing for such a strict output format. |
|
0
GYM -> MUSHUP -> create a new mushup -> click the "Add random problems" under the problem list |
|
+4
This feature is only for mushup, you can access it through: GYM -> MUSHUP -> create a new mushup -> click the "Add random problems" under the problem list (seems unfriendly for those who are unfamiliar with MUSHUP? (Including me)) |
|
+8
How can I remove a list from "Shared with me"? I wanna keep it empty. |
|
+10
Congrats |
|
0
As a newcomer, you have 1200 hidden initial ratings, divided into the first five contests sent to you. If you don't perform well in the first 5 contests, the rating sent to you will be reduced, but you will not be given negative ratings. The following contests after first 5 contrsts will directly settle your total rating. So all in all, instead of going up to 783, you're going down from 1200 to 783. |
|
0
Thanks, I see it. It seems like that it is easy to find such data. |
|
0
Can anyone tell me why my code for D got accepted with time complexity of O(n²)? Is there any data could hack my solution: 277446088? |
|
0
How to gain rating in EDU Round? I've droped the rating at almost every the EDU round. |
|
0
The color you fill the rectangle with is the color that the cells you select are. |
|
On
MikeMirzayanov →
Codeforces Single Account Policy: zh0ukangyang is Removed from the Rating, 2 years ago
+33
There have been so many mistakes you probably can't even count them in Goodbye 2023. Here's just a few: 1.Weak pretests in A. 2.Incorrect and self-contradicting usage of "divisor" in the statement of B. 3.Incorrect and self-contradicting usage of "parent" in the statement of E. 4.F has appeared previously. 5.G doesn't have a proven solution. 6.Author's solution of G is incorrectly implemented. 7.H is too easy. 8.H is in OEIS. --copied from other's comment. Just turn to that blog and you will find the truth. |
| Name |
|---|


