| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
| Название |
|---|



Suffix automaton solves this(maybe that is overkill, not sure).
You can solve it in O(NlogN) with Suffix Array + Longest Common Prefix Array. Since same substrings will be in adcajent indexes in suffix array, you can easily eliminate them. I mean first calculate the number of same substrings then substract it from (N*(N+1))/2
Actually there is a problem distinct substring (easy one link:distinct substring). I have solved it using suffix array but new substring has strict timelimit.....please suggest
O(NlogN) will work with N <= 50,000. But if you want more optimal you can get suffix array and LCP array in O(N).
thanks I will try to do it with O(n)...
I have solved both actually using java 2 years ago using suffix array and LCP. I used a faster Suffix Array construction to pass the hard one. Do you want it?
Yes i want please give me your java code and explain how u optimized it....thanks
This was my code for the easy problem
http://ideone.com/0BbVs3
The suffix array code is taken from competitive programming 3 and it gave me TLE for the hard version of the problem. So, I searched the internet for another suffix array implementation and actually I used it with the same approach.
Here is the code
http://ideone.com/kW5UFT
Thanks Safrout
Also counting the paths of a suffix automaton will solve it in linear time.